Top pCloud Alternatives for Fast Large File Sharing in 2025

pCloud has long been a reliable choice for cloud storage and file sharing, but in 2025, there are more options than ever for people who need to send large files quickly. Whether you’re collaborating with a remote team, transferring media to clients, or simply sending a huge batch of photos to friends, modern file-sharing services now offer faster upload speeds, generous file size limits, and better security.

Below are some of the best pCloud alternatives in 2025 that focus on fast, large file sharing without unnecessary complexity.

1. FileFlap

For users who want simplicity without sacrificing capability and large file upload, FileFlap is a solid choice. It allows uploads up to 1 TB per file, with collections reaching up to 5 TB and a retention period of up to 30 days. You can upload files without signing up, which makes it perfect for quick, one-off transfers.

One of its strengths is transparent pricing: the first 10 GB is free, and beyond that, you pay as you go starting at $5 per 100 GB. It also includes full CDN delivery for faster downloads and advanced analytics available even for free accounts. The ease of use is a key highlight — one-click upload and share — and because it doesn’t require a signup, it’s quick to get started.

FileFlap is best for people who need occasional large file transfers without the commitment of a subscription, especially for sending time-sensitive media or large work archives.

2. WeTransfer Pro

WeTransfer has been a household name for years, and its Pro plan is particularly well-suited for large file sharing in 2025. It supports files up to 200 GB per transfer and provides password protection, custom branding, and 1 TB of storage for ongoing access.

What sets WeTransfer apart is its minimalistic interface and straightforward process — drag, drop, and send. The free version works for smaller files (up to 2 GB), but professional users benefit most from the Pro features, especially when security and branding matter. While retention is shorter than some competitors without a subscription, WeTransfer remains a go-to for creatives and marketers.

3. Smash

Smash has carved a niche for itself by removing traditional file size limits for transfers, making it one of the most flexible pCloud alternatives. In practice, extremely large files may take longer depending on your connection, but the lack of a hard cap is appealing for those sending huge video or design files.

The free version offers transfers with retention of up to 7 days, while the paid version extends retention, adds priority transfers, and allows customization with your own branding. It also integrates with productivity tools like Slack and Trello, which makes it ideal for remote teams. Smash focuses on speed and creative flexibility, and its web-based system means no need for heavy desktop apps.

4. Dropbox Transfer

Dropbox is best known for its cloud storage, but Dropbox Transfer is specifically designed for sending large files. The service supports transfers up to 100 GB per file with custom branding, password protection, and delivery tracking.

Since it’s backed by Dropbox’s infrastructure, delivery is smooth, and files are accessible from multiple devices. The key advantage here is integration — if you already use Dropbox for collaboration, Dropbox Transfer fits naturally into your workflow. For occasional senders, the free tier is limited, but for Dropbox subscribers, it’s a convenient all-in-one solution.

5. MASV

MASV targets video professionals, filmmakers, and creative agencies who routinely deal with massive file sizes. With support for transfers up to 5 TB per file, MASV is built for high-performance environments. Its pay-as-you-go model means you’re charged only for the data you send, making it a flexible alternative for occasional but large projects.

Security is a key focus, with AES-256 encryption in transit and at rest. MASV also offers automated delivery to cloud storage platforms like Amazon S3, Google Drive, and Frame.io, streamlining creative workflows. While it’s not the cheapest option for frequent small transfers, its ability to handle enormous files reliably makes it a top pick for large-scale media work.

6. Google Drive (with Shared Links)

While not marketed solely as a file transfer service, Google Drive remains a practical alternative thanks to its 15 GB of free storage and generous individual file size limit of up to 5 TB. When paired with shared links, it can serve as a fast and reliable way to send large files, especially to other Google users.

Drive integrates seamlessly with Docs, Sheets, and other Google Workspace apps, and it supports real-time collaboration. However, because it’s more of a storage system than a dedicated file-sending platform, retention is based on how long you keep the file in your account, rather than a set expiry date. This makes it ideal for ongoing projects rather than one-off transfers.

7. SendAnywhere

SendAnywhere offers a mix of instant, direct transfers and cloud-based sharing, supporting files up to 50 GB in its cloud storage option. It uses a six-digit key for quick device-to-device transfers without uploading to a central server, which is great for privacy and speed when devices are nearby.

The web version also supports email links for remote sharing, with retention up to 48 hours for free users and extended limits for premium subscribers. SendAnywhere’s appeal lies in its combination of speed, cross-platform compatibility, and no-login-required transfers for smaller files.

Choosing the Right pCloud Alternative

When picking a pCloud alternative for large file sharing in 2025, the key factors to consider are:

  • Maximum file size: Services like FileFlap, MASV, and Smash stand out for massive limits.
  • Retention period: Shorter retention is fine for quick exchanges, but longer storage helps with ongoing projects.
  • Ease of use: One-click uploads (FileFlap, WeTransfer) save time, while integrations (Dropbox Transfer, Smash) streamline workflows.
  • Security: If handling sensitive material, look for encryption and password protection.
  • Cost: Pay-as-you-go options like MASV and FileFlap are good for occasional use; subscriptions work better for regular transfers.

With so many strong contenders, pCloud users looking for speed and large file capacity in 2025 have more options than ever — whether they value minimal signup friction, enterprise-grade reliability, or the ability to send multi-terabyte projects in one go.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *